|
|
|
|||
|
|
Jokaku-bo
Kosai (1163-1247)
The Single Calling
On Mt. Hiei,
there used to be a great scholar named Shoge-bo. He had a young
disciple whose
premature death so deeply impressed upon him the instability of all
things that
he grew tired of all social connections. So in his thirty-sixth year in
1198, he
renounced the world entirely and became a disciple of Honen under the
name of
Jokaku-bo Kosai.
Now Kosai looked at the Pure Land teaching from the standpoint of the Tendai school in which he had been trained, and thus his teaching was influenced by the doctrine of innate enlightenment (hongaku). He regarded Amida as having two personalities: one is the “fundamental” or “original”, and the other is the “incarnate” personality. The Amida who attained perfect enlightenment ten kalpas ago is called the “incarnate” Amida. The “fundamental” Amida is that original intelligence which is without beginning and is the same as the buddha-nature (bussho) which is innate in us all. He felt that it is enough if one just hears this truth. So, under this conviction, there is no need to call upon the sacred name many times - just once is enough. This is what he called the “single calling” teaching (ichinen-gi). Now Honen contended that this was quite against Shan-tao’s ideas and very much in error. But Kosai wouldn’t accept this and continued to insist on his own views until Honen could no longer keep him as his disciple. So he expelled him from the community after the The Seven Article Pledge (Shichikajo kishomon) was written in response to the Genkyu Oppression during the winter of 1204.
The
Spread of the Single Calling and Honen’s Rebuke
Motochika, the Minister of War, who had become a devout believer in Honen's teaching, also came under Kosai’s influence. Learning that Motochika never failed to repeat the sacred name fifty thousand times a day. Kosai tried to convince him of the “single calling” teaching and criticized him for his frequent repetitions. This led to their exchanging questions and answers back and forth several times. Finally, Motochika wrote a letter to Honen explaining Kosai’s views as: “apparently accepting that anyone, monastics included, who is devoted to the nembutsu may have no hesitation about getting married"; and that, "It is next to impossible for a person to attain ojo by his own efforts. So after one has adopted the teaching of emancipation by faith alone, it’s definitely useless for them to repeat the nembutsu a large number of times."
Honen
in reply wrote: “I think I understand the meaning of your letter. I can
see
from the attached note the present state of your faith, and I am really
pleased
that it’s not in any way different from my own. It
is being said these days that it is totally useless to repeat the nembutsu many times and that once is enough. But this subject is
barely
worth discussing. Has the person who
says such
things - and in saying so is a long way off from the sutras and the
commentaries - has he himself already attained enlightenment? This is
surely
very doubtful. Moreover, it is said that for the person who believes in
the
Original Vow, it doesn’t matter at all whether one breaks the precepts
or not.
This also doesn’t deserve any answer. Something like this can be found
nowhere
except in heretical Buddhism. Aren’t those who talk such nonsense in
these days
basically devils, making a sham of the nembutsu?
This is all I can say on the subject at present."
Now
some disciples of Kosai were trying to establish the “single calling”
teaching
in the province of Echigo in Niigata on the northwest coast of Japan.
Komyo-bo,
a disciple of Honen and a follower of Ryukan’s teaching of “many
callings” (tannen-gi), thought this
teaching was absurd and wrote a letter to Honen. To
this Honen sent the following reply: "The teaching of ojo by a ‘single calling’ has spread through the whole
capital. The
thing is too preposterous to spend words on and is hardly worth a reply.
In short, it comes from a misconception
of the meaning of the
passage in the Sutra of Immeasurable Life which
says, ‘calling once upon the sacred name with a joyous and believing
heart,'
and also from the passage in Shan-tao’s Commentary, 'One can definitely attain ojo, only
on the condition that one has no doubts, by ten repetitions of the nembutsu or even one, or by as many as possible one’s whole life
through.'
Those who have this misconception settle down into a mischievous
delusion. In
the original, the words ‘one’s whole life
through'
are emphatic. But we have a lot of dull and ignorant people in these
days, who
persist in saying that it’s enough to call upon the sacred name ten
times or
even once. They entirely ignore what is meant by the expression, 'one’s
whole
life through.' This is a totally shameless way of practice.”
"Now
it is true that Amida Buddha in his great compassion, shown in the
Original
Vow, will come to welcome those who repeat the nembutsu ten times or even once. Believing that there is no merit
comparable
with this, we should to do it all our lives long without ceasing. There
are
plenty of passages which prove this clearly, and there is no need of
producing
them here or saying anything about them. But when people with these
deluded
opinions are opposed, they will doubtless say in reply, ‘I believe in
the
‘single calling,' but by this I don’t mean that the person is not to
call on
the sacred name any more at all after that one time.' Well, this seems
all
right enough, yet such a person's mind is not yet got rid of delusion.
So after
the first calling, he does not call any more. Then he says that we must
believe
that 'single calling' is enough for the removal of the ten
transgressions (ju-aku) and the five
grevious acts (gogyakuzai), and so how
much the more in the case of other minor offences.
Even though they should call on the sacred name many times, people who
hold to
such ideas certainly are not in harmony with the mind of Amida Buddha.
Where
can you find anything like this in any sutra or text, or in the
teaching of any
Buddhist scholars? This is the talk of people who belong to a lazy,
immoral,
and deluded community, who want to practice foolishness to their
heart's
content. Such people are Buddhist heretics. They are like parasites in
the
heart of a lion. I wonder if they have just simply lost their minds
under the
influence of bad spirits, and so get in the way of many persons' ojo. We should definitely avoid such people. It is impossible
here to
write further details."
As a
result of Komyo-bo's letter, Honen decided to issue a written
instruction in
prohibition of this “single calling” teaching which runs as follows:
“There are
in these days a set of nembutsu
followers who
are both ignorant themselves and lead others astray. They have not yet
come to
understand the system of teaching of our school, and they are not even
familiar
with the technical terms of the Dharma. They are without devotion to
the way.
They are looking for their own personal advantage, and so with false
words,
they confuse people's minds with delusive thoughts. In this way, they
are
planning for their own livelihood with no thought of the punishment for
their
actions which await them in the world to come. As an excuse for their
own
do-nothing teaching, they spread about the false principle of 'single
calling'.
On top of that they start a new teaching of no calling at all. So they
lose the
small merit of even the single calling. They cut off the little root of
good
they have and further aggravate their already heavy bad karma. In order
to
indulge themselves in the momentary pleasures of various desires, they
do not
avoid the terrible karma that will keep them in the three unfortunate
realms
throughout endless kalpas. They say,
‘Those who
put your trust in Amida's Vow don’t need to be ashamed of committing
the five
grievous offences (gogyakuzai), and so
go ahead
and do them to your heart's content. Don’t wear the monastic robes,
just put on
ordinary clothes. Don’t stop from eating meat or indulging in sex. Eat
as much
red meat and chicken as you like, etc.’ Kukai, the great founder of the
Shingon
school, used to say about those who are in the lowest of all mental
states that
they are like lambs and sheep which live only for food and sex. Now
these
people definitely belong to this degenerate community, don’t they? They
belong
to the lowest of the ten mental stages in which people are found and
are
destined to transmigrate through the three unfortunate realms.
Shouldn’t we
feel for these people? Not only are they opposed to the teachings of
all the
other schools, but they have broken from the practice of the nembutsu too. They encourage people to be shamefully lazy in
practice, and
they would have the monks themselves throw away the precepts and go
back to the
secular life entirely. We have never had such delusion in our country
before.
This must be the work of devils. It means the destruction of the Dharma
of the buddhas
and the perversion of the people.”
“They
go on talking such falsehoods as the following: 'Honen Shonin's
repetition of
the nembutsu seventy thousand times a
day is
only an accommodation to the outside public. The real inner truth is
something
different which people don’t know about. If you only knew in your heart
what
Amida's Vow was, you would certainly attain ojo
in the Land of Perfect Bliss. Here is where the Pure Land practice is
entirely
satisfying. What is the need then over and above this of even a single
repetition of the nembutsu? Once
when Honen was
talking with twenty of his disciples in his room on the secret
teachings which
he himself held, the superficial among them were so stupid they
couldn’t
understand him. But five clever ones among them got the deep meaning of
his
teaching, and I am one of them. This then is that secret view which he
personally holds. He doesn’t transmit it very readily to others, but
chooses
those to whom he communicates it.'”
"If
this rumor is correct, then the whole thing is a fabrication. Out of
pity for
those who may be misled by this, I hereby take my oath that if I have
by
speaking or writing in any such way as to falsely conceal my views, may
the
Buddha, Dharma and Sangha now look down upon me, and may I lose all the
merit
that I have gained from my seventy thousand daily repetitions of the nembutsu.
Even a follower of the 'perfect' teaching of the Tendai who has
been meditating upon ultimate reality cannot attain the knowledge of
the
non-existence of all things until he has completed the six perfections (paramita). No matter
what teaching is
involved, who can realize what they seek without some form of
discipline? So
those that are caught in this net of doubt still might get free and
might cut
their way out of the forest of delusion. With honest hearts, they might
escape
from the iron castle of future misery and ascend the golden stands in
the Pure
Land by abandoning this. I now communicate my thoughts by letter to you
in your
far-away northern province. Apply your mind strenuously to the study of
the
sacred scriptures. Though mountains, rivers and clouds may separate us
from
each other by many thousands of miles, our mutual affinity for the way
of the
buddhas will definitely bring us together at last. I have so many
things to say
to you that I can’t possibly tell you all by letter. Nineteenth day of
the
sixth month of 1209. Signed Honen."
Because of Kosai's
radical position, as well as the fact that his ichinen
doctrine won many supporters both inside and outside the community
of Honen's
followers, he became the chief target of the older schools attacks
on the nembutsu movement.
Even among Honen's disciples, some, such as Bencho
and his disciple Ryochu who succeeded to the Chinzei lineage of
the Pure Land sect, criticized Kosai's
teachings as heretical. Thus
today it is hard to gain an accurate idea of his teachings as
only two of his works, the Keishi kasho ruiju and the Gengibun,
have survived. Kosai established his base on the island of Shikoku,
south of present day Osaka.
Reference:
The text has been edited and adapted from the Pictorial Biography of Honen Shonin (Honen
Shonin gyojoezu), also known as the Forty-eight Fascicle Biography
(Shijuhachikan-den) with reference to the translation made by
Harper Havelock Coates and Ryugaku Ishizuka entitled Honen the Buddhist Saint: His Life and
Teaching. Kyoto: Chion-in, 1925.
Copyright(c) by
1996-2006 Jodo Shu Research Institute